One thing I have observed is that we love to analyse.
Be it for a cricket match or the box office results of a movie
or any political situation or why did s/he say that
or any damn thing.

The analysis might be a pre-analysis or post-analysis.
A pre-analysis tries to find out what can be the outcome
along with figuring out the variables of the situation.
A post-analysis tries to understand what happened.
But most of the times it just leads to a blame game.
There are very few who take the analysis and decide something.

Recently we had a meeting in office having some 50 people.
We had 4 teams attending it with a head.
Half of the meeting was spent on frivolous stuff.
The rest was spent on actual problems.
One team lead said he faced this problem
and we all knew that this problem has been there for quite some time.
But I was totally suprised to hear the head's reply,
oh we can't do anything for this, its not possible, you would have to live with it.
Suprised because I knew that the problem is solvable
when you are at the head's position
and because if the head can't solve this problem
what the hell is he sitting there for?

We call meetings, fix blame on someone,
who blames someone else, and so on and
finally the blame will come on the situation itself,
or God or the Devil.

That reminds me of a famous quote by Forrest Gump
"Life's like a box of chocolates,
You never know what you're gonna get."